Listing Warning Removal Cost on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko

How much does listing warning removal cost?

The cost of listing warning removal starts from $1,100 / project. The final scope depends not on the warning itself, but on how much data needs to be checked, what corrections are available to the project team, and how complete the existing confirmation package is.

Before agreeing on the work, we clarify where the message is displayed, what project information is currently published, and what has changed since it appeared. This helps distinguish a profile update task from a more complex discrepancy analysis and submission preparation. The estimate separately covers the review, necessary materials, text work, and the delivery process.

To request an estimate, prepare:

• a link to the project page and a screenshot of the message;
• current official links, contract addresses, and network details;
• documents or public confirmations related to the stated issue;
• a brief description of any changes and submissions already made.

The more specific the initial data, the more accurately the scope of work can be determined. If the issue relates to a routine information update, compare it with the profile update service; if there are doubts about the completeness of project data, an audit and information check may be needed.

What corrections can help with a warning?

Corrections are chosen based on the warning content: first, determine which field, link, or confirmation requires attention, then cross-check it with the project's current data. There is no universal set of fixes, so work begins with diagnostics, not mass page editing.

Depending on the situation, the team may check:

• consistency of the project name, ticker, network, and contract address;
• availability of the official website and social channels listed in the profile;
• alignment of the product description with the project's current state;
• accuracy of links to the explorer, documentation, and team resources;
• availability of materials confirming the information that needs clarification.

After the cross-check, we compile a list of specific actions: what the project team should correct, which wording needs clarification, what evidence to attach, and in what order to submit the information. Work on the page may include preparing accurate data and the submission, but does not replace actual changes made by the project owners.

If the warning appeared after a tokenomics change, migration, or update of key links, mention this immediately. Context helps connect current information with the project's history and avoids submitting contradictory data. For detailed steps, see the listing warning removal guide.

How is the warning check on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko conducted?

The check links the warning wording with the project information available on its page and in official sources. We collect initial data, cross-reference it, and create a clear correction plan.

At the start, it is important to accurately capture the message: do not paraphrase it, but save a screenshot and the page link. Then, project and token identifiers, links, descriptions, and public confirmations are verified. Items that the team can fix independently are noted separately from issues requiring clarification or documents from the project.

The approach to the two aggregators may differ in scope: the warning and available profile elements should be considered in the context of the specific page, not by copying a ready answer from one platform to another. We prepare materials separately for the chosen listing and coordinate them with the team before submission.

Before starting, ensure you have access to the project's official channels and someone responsible for approving information. If the issue affects not only the warning but also the listing process, check the listings and verification section. For comprehensive profile restoration, a separate scope of work is described.

What is included in the cost and how are timelines determined?

Before starting, you receive an agreed task list; upon completion, you get prepared materials for the next step. Timelines are set after the initial analysis, when the volume of initial data, necessary approvals, and the composition of corrections are clear.

Depending on the agreed task, the work may include:

• warning analysis and current profile review;
• a prioritized list of identified discrepancies;
• recommendations for data correction on the project side;
• description editing and preparation of explanations;
• collection and structuring of supporting materials;
• preparation of the submission text and handover of next steps.

Before work begins, clarify who on the project side will confirm technical details and can make changes to official resources. If materials are incomplete, we first agree on what needs to be requested from the team to avoid preparing a submission based on unverified data.

The price is calculated per project, not per number of individual edits in correspondence. When requesting an estimate, specify the platform, profile link, warning text, and expected outcome. If you need to change the information composition itself without analyzing the warning, compare the task with the listing profile update separately.

What does the platform decide on its own?

Our responsibility is the agreed audit, preparation of accurate materials, and execution of specified actions; the decision on status display remains with the platform. CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko independently evaluate the provided information, apply their own verification rules, and decide whether to change the warning and when to update the page. Therefore, we cannot guarantee removal of the mark, a specific review timeline, or the desired outcome.

To reduce the risk of delays in preparation, check before submission:

• whether addresses and links match across all official sources;
• whether claims about the network, token, and product are confirmed;
• whether the profile description and documents contradict each other;
• whether the team can quickly respond to clarification requests and provide data sources.

Do not submit different versions of the description through multiple channels without coordination. Keep a copy of the submitted materials and a list of changes to respond consistently to additional requests. If new facts emerge after submission, first clarify them with the executor, then prepare an updated explanation.

We separate project preparation from the external review stage in advance and specify which actions are included in the agreed price. Terms of engagement and boundaries of responsibility can also be checked on the guarantees and returns page.

When is a profile update sufficient, and when is separate work needed?

A profile update is suitable if the issue is limited to outdated descriptions or links and the team can confirm current information. Separate warning removal work is needed when the cause of the warning must first be determined, sources cross-referenced, and substantiated explanations prepared.

To choose the format, use a simple rule:

• you know the exact field that is outdated and have accurate data — request a profile update;
• the reason for the message is unclear or sources conflict — start with a warning check;
• the network, contract, or key project parameters have changed — prepare a change history and confirmations;
• the warning concerns multiple pages or materials — agree on a unified workflow.

Do not order additional services just because they are related to listings. First, determine the specific result needed: corrected information, a prepared submission, or a data set check. This avoids mixing editing, technical verification, and platform interaction.

If you need an analysis and recovery plan, describe the situation via the service page. For a general comparison of prices and formats, see the pricing section.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Submit initial dataSend the listing link, exact warning text, and a screenshot. Add the project's official resources and briefly describe the change history.
2. Agree on diagnosticsWe cross-check the message with the profile data and note which information requires correction or confirmation.
3. Confirm the plan and scopeReceive a task list, price, and timeline calculated based on material preparation and project-side approvals.
4. Prepare correctionsThe project team confirms facts and makes necessary changes to their resources. We prepare agreed explanations and confirmations.
5. Submit materials and check the resultYou receive a package of prepared materials and next steps. After submission, keep correspondence and be ready to provide clarifications.